Report:
US No closer to Iraq Goals

BRADLEY BROOKS / AP 6apr2008

 

Mindfully.org note:

The invasion of Iraq was poorly reasoned, conceived and carried out. Its goals were vague at best. And indeed, the explicit reasons for it were lies and exaggerations. The Iraqis would like the US presence to cease as it has been one disaster after another, with little if any gains. In the eyes of the rest of the world, the US has been entirely humiliated and shown for what it really is — a true terrorist with not even the slightest idea of right. 

This so-called Institute of Peace is concerned with peace in name only. Its board is hand-picked by George W. Bush.

Condoleezza Rice, Robert M. Gates, Richard H. Solomon and Frances C. Wilson are its ex officio members. This group wants peace, but only on terms that favor a continued presence and dominance by the U.S.A. 

In other words, this report lacks validity and sincerity.

The United States is no closer to achieving its goals in Iraq than it was a year ago but a quick military withdrawal could lead to massive chaos and even genocide, according to a report released Sunday by a U.S. think tank.

The U.S. Institute of Peace report was written by experts who advised the Iraq Study Group, a panel mandated by Congress to offer recommendations on U.S. policy in Iraq in 2006.

The report was released two days before top commander Gen. David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker brief Congress on the situation in Iraq and prospects for American troop reductions. Their recommendations, which President Bush has signaled he will accept, could largely determine the course of action in Iraq for the coming year.

The report cited security improvements in Iraq since the buildup of U.S. forces in 2007, but credited factors outside U.S. control, such as help from mostly Sunni fighters who turned against al-Qaida and a truce by a Shiite militia.

"The U.S. is no closer to being able to leave Iraq than it was a year ago," it concluded. "Lasting political development could take five to 10 years of full, unconditional U.S. commitment to Iraq."

The U.S. Embassy in Baghdad did not immediately respond to an e-mailed request for comment. But U.S. officials have repeatedly said that some political goals have been achieved in Iraq thanks in part to the buildup of forces, though they acknowledge that much remains to be done.

The institute's report warned that a substantial reduction of U.S. troops in Iraq risks "a complete failure of the Iraqi state, massive chaos and even genocide."

If the Americans opt for a reduced commitment, the report said, they should focus on improving political and economic development.

But an unconditional withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq must be coupled with an increased American military presence in neighboring countries, ready to intervene in case of a major crisis in Iraq, the report said. The U.S. should also redouble efforts to build regional political alliances, it added.

In the past year, Iraq's parliament has passed legislation the U.S. considers key to the country's future stability, including relaxing a ban on former Saddam Hussein supporters in government, an amnesty for some prisoners, increased powers at the provincial level and approval of a national budget.

But implementation of those policies has been uneven, the report said.

"Without political progress, the U.S. risks getting bogged down in Iraq for a long time to come," it concluded.

source: 6apr2008


About the United States Institute of Peace

By law, the United States Institute of Peace is governed by a bipartisan Board of Directors. The board is composed of twelve members from outside federal service appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the Senate, and four ex-officio members: the secretary of state (who may designate another Senate-confirmed State Department official), the secretary of defense (who may designate another Senate-confirmed Defense Department official), the president of the National Defense University (who may designate the vice president of the National Defense University), and the president of the Institute (nonvoting). The board is prohibited by law from having more than eight voting members of the same political party. More at the Institute of Peace website. . .

To send Mindfully.org your comments, questions, and suggestions click here
The home page of this website is www.mindfully.org
Please see our Fair Use Notice