Alternatives to Plastic
PAUL GOETTLICH 3aug2005
rev.23nov2007
[Portuguese version | More by Paul Goettlich]
Over the past few of years, many people asked me for help in getting plastic out of their lives. It is hoped that this article guides you to a cleaner lifestyle. While it is presently impossible to actually remove all plastic from one's life, it is definitely worth reducing it to a minimum. Being my age is greater than 50 years, I came into a world that was nearly free of the scourge that has come to fruition since then. My own attitude contrasts greatly with pretty much all anti-plastic activists — I am considerably more adamant about removing all plastics from his life and not so concerned about the type of plastic it is or every single chemical within each. It is through years of research that I have seen that all plastics must be stopped rather than one or even many. As you approach this subject, please do so at a pace that doesn’t overburden you into dropping the issue altogether. But do keep moving along as quickly as is practical.
Below are images of the my container collection used in contact with food and drink. Each is labeled and some have suggestions for other uses and sources. These are most likely what you came to this article for. However, getting plastic out of your life is more about a change in lifestyle than merely removing a few plastic containers in your home. I am working on a book that will include suggestions for a lifestyle change. What it requires is simply using common sense and a healthy disrespect for status quo. Stop worrying about looking out of place in a world injected and coated with plastic. Start your lifestyle change by disconnecting from consumerism and commercials. Disconnect the TV cable — 500 stations with little truth or logic on any station is a crime. Stop your newspaper subscription. Considering that newspapers are more 50% advertising and the other 50% a lie, it's a crime to use new or recycled paper for this purpose.
Lifestyle changes are things that I have taken on gradually over the years. Nobody told me what to do. The norm never had much appeal for me because it takes too much energy — financial, physical, psychological and so on. And it's all to keep up with the Joneses.
What it took to learn was to think logically about what I was doing and to decide whether I cared about keeping up appearances. I'd identify things of this nature that should be done differently and find ways to accomplish the changes. One of my latest changes was making and bottling my own ketchup. I used to purchase organic ketchup in glass bottles. Over the last few years, there were fewer manufacturers that packed it in glass bottles. Then the last one to pack ketchup in glass was the company Seeds Of Change. After it was purchased and controlled by M&M/Mars, the ketchup got packaged in plastic bottles. We all know what type of health food that M&M/Mars is famous for — vitamin C (candy, chocolate). [Read "The Green Machine"] So, the day they stopped packing ketchup in glass, I started cooking my own. After all, what sense does it make to eat organic foods that are packaged in plastic? And my homemade ketchup is substantially better than any store-bought on the market now or in the past because I make it to please my own taste instead of blindly buying whatever some scientist advised the company to make. I make a few quarts at a time and can it in pint-size glass canning jars. For the purest, there are canning jars with glass lids. They too have a plastic seal. But plastic exposure is greatly reduced.
Regulatory System in the USA
Because our regulatory system was created to protect the interests of the corporate producers, it seems that one of the best ways to regulate them is to first be forewarned of the environmental and social toxicity they produce and just refuse to buy it. If we can do this, then they will change or be run out of business. But whatever we do, we must produce and consume less; eat lower on the food chain; transport food shorter distances; and replace most machines with manual labor. This is the making of small sustainable organic farms, which still produce more food per acre than most large corporate monoculture farms. [Read "Small Is Bountiful by Peter Rosset / The Ecologist, v.29, i.8, Dec99]
The Organic Standards that so many of us fought so hard to correct and maintain, for the most part, have been taken over by corporations. As such those standards are not at all what many people assume. They have been diluted and polluted to the point where we are once again better off doing it ourselves. This falls into line with the desire to have as little to do with corporations as possible when it comes to food and other things. There is a growing number of organic farmers who do not bother getting certified by the FDA as "organic" anymore because they hold higher standards and know better than the FDA [Read "Kristie and Rick Knoll Rebel Against Corporate-Controlled USDA Regulation of Organic," by Will Harper 5jan04.]
It has been stated by many wise people that if a deal seems too good to be true, then it is too good to be true. The same thing applies to almost everything we have taken for granted when the "experts" and authorities have told us to do so. With regards to food, until you can grow your own independent of corporations, you will not be free of the toxic way of life they sell. But between where you are now and where you need to be, there's a lot of work to be done on the way you think. And it is never to early to begin. Some of the values of the 1960s are useful in ridding your mind of the corporate ways. But as we all know, many of those hippies went on to the board rooms that are wreaking havoc upon us all now. This is not about inventing machines or products or technologies. But rather it is about leaving those false values behind and doing with as little technology as possible. Instead of a workout room, take on a garden — a large one. Whether it is located in an inner-city lot or in the middle of nowhere. . . just do it.
Can Technology Save the Planet?
For me, that's just another rhetorical question. The answer is, of course, not.
Lately, I have seen some sort of biodegradable plates, cups and utensils for sale at the small grocery I shop at, as well as The Hole (aka Whole Foods). It matters not what the material is or who makes it. I see them as just another ploy to maintain the consumerist status quo. We really don't need such stuff except for "emergencies." And materials that have had unnatural acts perpetrated on them cannot return to the earth in their original state. Single-use containers, bags and other products should not be used. Their use can never be a sustainable act, no matter what the manufacturer claims. These products are counterproductive, making the purchaser feel as if they are doing some good in the world, when in fact they are not. Sorry for the let-down if you use this stuff. But you didn't come here for the usual nonsense that you get from the mega-sized environmental nonprofits starting with the Sierra Club.
In his article in the July/August 2005 issue of his Sierra Magazine, Carl Pope, the Sierra Club's executive director ['Ways & Means: Let's Get Technical: Time to put the engineers to work'], "[e]ngineers are natural allies of environmentalists. We point out problems in the world; engineers solve them — at least when they're allowed to." I find it incredibly horrifying that the director of the largest environmental organization in the USA — more than 3/4 of a million members — thinks that engineers will solve the mess we're all in. It was the engineers who got us into this mess and they've not learned a thing about sustainability in the mean time.
Another article in that same issue, 'Can Technology Save the Planet?' by the futurist and science fiction writer Bruce Sterling states that "[o]ur opposable thumbs got us into this mess, and they can help get us out." The combination of technological fixes in this issue of Sierra Magazine were quite annoying because they illustrated the severe lack of understanding of the very technologies they hawk as solutions, when in fact they are the problems. The articles on technology in that issue are severely flawed and must be disregarded.
As each new layer of technology is added, going back to a sustainable lifestyle becomes increasingly more difficult. How many times have we all heard someone proclaim that they can't live without one technology or another? This is an amazingly paradoxical statement when a person claims that they would perish without the very items that are in fact killing them, albeit at relatively slow rates — generational declines in overall health and well-being.
The answer to the question of Can Technology Save the Planet? is emphatically and resoundingly NO. But then the question is flawed because the planet will indeed survive long after we destroy life as we know it. So, if we ask the correct question — Can Technology Save Us? — the answer is still NO.
We need to buy less technology as well as less of everything if we are to survive. If we've gotten to the point where we cannot survive without technology, then we are all in a very sad predicament. For the only direction is down from there. Consider the prospect of having your brain uploaded into a computer. That may seem a bit drastic. But if your physical body is worn out, then that would be the only option — if it truly existed.
And if you're comfortable with "living" in a computer, then you'd better find a whole new set of scientists to take stock in because the ones who are running the show at present couldn't argue their way out of a worn out paper bag. And I wear them out quite well before recycling them. However, recycling the constant stream of scientists would be a much more difficult task as it requires total reprogramming of a lifetime of mis- and dis-information. It would essentially take another lifetime. They would first need to experience the error of their present knowledge before rebuilding a new set of information. The world as they see it does not exist.
That's a neat trick, eh? It's rather like sawing of the limb of a tree that one is standing on.
Sincerely,
Paul
|
Glass milk bottles |
|
Small glass jars |
|
Our cat loves us because we have glass bowls for his food and water. His dry food is kept in a large glass bottle and refilled from 20 or 30 pound bags (see below). |
|
Tiffin
|
|
Large glass bottle |
|
Mixing Bowls |
|
Stainless Steel
Colander |
|
Here's a top view of (left to right) a colander, food mill and a strainer. A chinois (not shown) works well too. It has conical shape, with the tip pointing down. I use the strainer for sifting flour and straining the solids from a stock. |
|
This food mill is great for crushing tomatoes. The seeds and chunks of skin are left behind. I once had one of those stylish kitchen tools called a Cuisineart food processor. It took more time to clean it than it was worth. It also wastes a lot of space in the small kitchens that many people have. And for some of us, cranking the food mill or chopping with a knife is the only exercise we get. I do have an old blender that has a glass top rather than a plastic one. I think the newer models have polycarbonate tops. Lexan is one brand of polycarbonate plastic. To learn about polycarbonates, please read this article: "Get Plastic Out Of Your Diet". |
|
Cast iron waffle
mold |
|
One-Gallon Glass Jug |
|
Glass Refrigerator Storage |
|
Stainless steel containers imported from
India |
|
Bulk peanut butter in a salsa jar. Buy only as much as you'll consume in a week or so. For me, that's less than 1/2 a jar full. Weigh the jar and mark the weight on the top or side so that it may be subtracted at the cash register. Ask the manager about this before filling the jar. I had been purchasing olive oil as a bulk commodity in 1-quart juice bottles until I found an olive farmer who will refill that 10-litre stainless steel container above. I keep extras of these so I can buy fresh peanut or almond butter while the old one is being washed. |
|
Lids |
![]() |
Nonplastic Kitchen Tools |
![]() |
Bulk
Liquid Storage |
|
Lunch Containers for School or Work |
![]() |
Cast iron muffin pans from Lodge Mfg. must be seasoned with cooking oil to reduce sticking. The muffin holes are a bit too small for my liking, but they work great. |
![]() |
Stainless steel canteens by Kleen Kanteen. Be sure to get the s/s lids with them. I have two sizes — 20oz. and 44oz. |
![]() |
Large and small stainless steel bowls |
![]() |
Large Enameled Cast Iron Pan |
![]() |
Mismatched stainless flatware and ceramic plates |
![]() |
Camp wear |
![]() |
Measuring cups and spoons |
![]() |
Glass and a glazed cast iron pie plates |
|
Stainless steel steamer adjusts itself to fit the pot it is placed inside of. I steam a lot of food. Sometimes I use a large cylindrical steamer that fits atop a large pot. It has room for a few ears of corn, some small potatoes and a half-head of cabbage that is cut into smaller sections. |
No photo |
Paper Bags In the land of consumerism, paper bags are single-use products. Everything must be placed in a bag at the point of purchase, even if it is already in a bag and we only buy that one item. If I don't have my canvass bag, I would merely carry that one item without another bag. If I purchased so many items that I could not carry them without a bag and my canvass bag was not with me, then I would take a paper bag rather than a plastic bag. That paper bag must be treated with respect so as to reuse it as many times as possible. I carry used paper bags in my canvass bag when I shop. If I am buying some flour, I would use a bag that is just about worn out. But I would double it by putting it inside another bag. After the flour is dumped into a large glass jar with a tightly sealing lid, the interior well-worn bag that is now covered with flour is retired to the recycling bin. The outer bag is reused until it too can only be used to protect another bag from becoming covered with flour. |
![]() |
Natural Rubber Natural rubber pacifiers and nipples I have not researched natural rubber enough, but I think this is the right product. One outlet is Cotton Babies. They also have organic hemp cloth diapers and other stuff. I do not endorse this website, but only put it here as an example. Use glass baby bottles too. Never put food in plastic.... never. |
|
Transportation Also. . . don't drive your car to the grocery store. In fact, avoid driving one at all if possible. Avoid owning one too. Walk or ride your bicycle with saddle bags or baskets on it. Some people around Berkeley have trailers that attach to the back of the bicycle that can carry a fairly large load. There is a bicycle delivery service in Berkeley -- Pedal Express -- that can deliver up to 1,000 pounds on a bike! In a city, motor vehicles don't have as much of a speed advantage as on highways. But then when you think about it, most people travel between two points without knowing anything at all about everything in between. The journey has become a painful process as we are stuffed into cramped, toxic spaces of cars and planes. Not to mention being shot and killed if we don't fit the standard model of a citizen. Pay more attention to the doughnut than the hole. Take time to live and enjoy life rather than doing the things that the system teaches us to do and expects of us. These things are what keeps order as it is. Avoid doing those things that keep the dysfunctional system intact. Stop using it when ever possible. Deny its power each day by finding one more way to take control of your life. . . and doing it!. The things they have to offer, I don't want. They make me sick and drive me crazy. They are bad for the health of all life.
|
-
Recommended reading: "The Green Machine" by Jason Mark in The Monthly (Emeryville, CA) 1oct04
|
To
send us your comments, questions, and suggestions click
here |
























