Most Illicit Drug Users and Heavy Alcohol Users
Are
in the Workplace and May Pose Special Problems
PRESS RELEASE
SAMHSA / Department of Health and Human Services 16jul2007
|
See survey
highlights below
Mindfully.org
note:
Do follow the links to the complete survey. But take care not to place too
much importance on unemployment data as it is the official US government
version that only accounts for new applications for unemployment
compensation and not those who have exhausted their benefits and remain
unemployed.
We suspect that the numbers of people who have exhausted their benefits
and remain unemployed are far greater than those who have just now
applied.
From a reader:
Since most adult Americans work, most drug and alcohol users will of
course be found in the workplace. This "fact" is as useless as
pointing out that roughly half of American drug users are women, or that
100% of users of teething rings are infants. It is very effective,
however, in promoting the drug hysteria in the US and the economic
windfall being reaped by manufacturers of drug tests, whom we are paying
handsomely to help us violate the privacy of the hardworking men and women
in the American workplace.
Why does a report about drug use in Americans contain so much information
about drug testing? Maybe for the same reason that NASA employees were
pressured to deny global warming, and that the Department of Education
refuses to give grants to do research in evolutionary biology: the
government is no longer a good source for unbiased scientific information.
The government agencies responsible for healthcare, etc., have been
hijacked by special interests and by religious groups, and are no longer
interested in honesty or the facts. |
Most of the nation’s
approximately 16.4 million current illicit drug users and approximately 15
million heavy alcohol users hold full-time jobs, according to a new study by the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).
The study, Worker Substance Use and Workplace Policies and Programs, shows
that substance use can pose significant risks to workers’ health and
productivity. The report also says that workers who use illicit drugs are less
likely than nonusers to be employed by companies that have drug or alcohol
testing policies and programs.
"Substance abuse is a serious problem for the health, wellbeing and
productivity of everyone in the workplace," said SAMHSA Administrator Terry
Cline, Ph.D. "One important way SAMHSA is addressing this public health
risk is with 1-800-Workplace (1-800-967-5752), a helpline for employees and
businesses dealing with problems related to substance abuse. The helpline
provides advice on programs that can make a dramatic difference to everyone in
the workplace – programs such as substance abuse policy development,
supervisor and employee substance abuse education, employee assistance, and drug
testing."
Director of National Drug Control Policy John Walters said, "Employees
who use drugs miss work more often, are less healthy, and are more prone to
harming themselves and others in the workplace. We hope that employers will take
note of this report and consider implementing workplace drug testing policies
that can help prevent drug use before it starts, help identify drug-using
employees who need drug treatment services and also reduce employers’
liability from drug-related workplace accidents."
The report says the highest rates of current illicit drug use were among food
service workers (17.4 percent) and construction workers (15.1 percent). Highest
rates of current heavy alcohol use were found among construction, mining,
excavation and drilling workers (17.8 percent), and installation, maintenance,
and repair workers (14.7 percent).
Illicit drug use and heavy alcohol use are associated with higher levels of
absenteeism and frequent job changes, the report said. For example, nearly twice
as many current illicit drug users skipped one or more days of work in the past
month compared with workers who did not abuse drugs. Drug users were also far
more likely to report missing two or more work days in the past month due to
illness or injury compared with workers who did not abuse drugs.
"The high rates of drug and alcohol use in hazardous industries is cause
for concern," said Elena Carr, drug policy coordinator at the U.S.
Department of Labor (DOL). "Clearly businesses can ill-afford the risk of
having workers operating meat slicers, backhoes, or other dangerous equipment
while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, which is one reason why DOL helps
employers and employees work together to proactively prevent such safety
hazards."
Substance users also had far higher job turnover rates. Among full-time
workers who reported current illicit drug use, 12.3 percent said they had worked
for three or more employers in the past year, compared with 5.1 percent of
non-abusing workers.
Another major finding was that current drug users were more likely to work
for employers who did not conduct drug or alcohol testing programs. Nearly a
third of current illicit drug users said they would be less likely to work for
employers who conducted random drug testing.
Overall, approximately 30 percent of the full-time work force reported that
random drug testing took place in their current employment setting. Workers in
the transportation and material-moving (62.9 percent) and protective services
(61.8 percent) occupational categories were the most likely to report working
for employers who conducted random testing. Workers in legal occupations and
arts, design, entertainment, sports, and media occupational categories (10
percent) were the least likely to report working for employers who tested for
illicit drug or alcohol use on a random basis.
According to the study, unemployed people had higher percentages of current
illicit drug use and heavy alcohol use than those with full-time, part-time or
other employment statuses. But because full-time workers constitute about two
thirds of the 18-64-year-old population, the actual number of those using drugs
was higher among the full-time workers.
The study is based on data collected during 2002, 2003, and 2004 from a
nationally representative sample of 128,000 persons, ages 18 to 64, who
participated in SAMHSA’s National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Illicit drug
use is defined in the survey as use of marijuana/hashish, cocaine, heroin,
hallucinogens, or inhalants, or prescription psychotherapeutics used
non-medicinally. Current heavy alcohol use was defined as drinking five or more
drinks on the same occasion on five or more days in the past 30 days. The survey
also identified whether respondents had a substance use disorder, meaning drug
or alcohol dependence or abuse, based on standard diagnostic criteria.
The study showed that an annual average of approximately 9.4 million current
illicit drug users, (including 7.3 million current marijuana users) and 10.1
million heavy alcohol users were employed full-time in 2002-2004. Among
full-time workers using these substances, 3 million met criteria for illicit
drug dependence or abuse, and 10.5 million were dependent on or abused alcohol.
The full report is available at http://oas.samhsa.gov/work2k7/toc.cfm .
Copies of the full report are available for free from SAMHSA’s Health
Information Network at 1-877-SAMHSA-7 (1-877-726-4727). Request inventory number
SMA -07-4273. For related publications and information, visit http://www.samhsa.gov
Related SAMHSA link http://www.workplace.samhsa.gov/ is SAMHSA’s Division
of Workplace Programs, which offers information on 1-800-Workplace and how to
set up Drug-Free Workplace Programs for Federal agencies as well as private
industry.
Related DOL link http://www.dol.gov/workingpartners is DOL’s Working
Partners for an Alcohol- and Drug-Free Workplace Web site, which provides tools
and resources to help employers and employees work together to develop drug-free
workplace programs that protect worker safety and health.
SAMHSA is a public health agency within the Department of Health and
Human Services. The agency is responsible for improving the accountability,
capacity and effectiveness of the nation's substance abuse prevention,
addictions treatment, and mental health services delivery system.
source:
16jul2007
Worker Substance Use and
Workplace Policies and Programs
Sharon L. Larson,
Joe Eyerman,
Misty S. Foster,
Joseph C. Gfroerer
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Office of Applied Studies
Larson, S. L., Eyerman, J., Foster, M. S., & Gfroerer, J. C.
(2007). Worker Substance Use and Workplace Policies and Programs
(DHHS Publication No. SMA 07-4273, Analytic Series A-29). Rockville, MD:
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of
Applied Studies.
Highlights
This report presents findings on substance use among workers and on workplace
drug policy and programs from the 2002, 2003, and 2004 National Surveys on Drug
Use and Health (NSDUHs). NSDUH is an annual survey of the civilian,
noninstitutionalized population of the United States aged 12 years or
older. The survey is sponsored by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Administration (SAMHSA) to provide data on substance use and related issues
among the U.S. population.
NSDUH collects information on employment status, type of business, specific
occupations and industries, and information on drug-testing policies and
programs from U.S. workers. This report analyzes the worker information in
conjunction with the substance use data collected in the survey to investigate
substance use among full-time employed U.S. workers aged 18 to 64 during the
period 2002 to 2004.
Substance Use among Workers, by Demographic and Geographic
Characteristics
- The prevalences of substance use behaviors and substance use disorders are
higher among unemployed persons than among full-time workers, part-time
workers, and those with other employment status. However, because full-time
workers constitute about two thirds of the population aged 18 to 64 (or
114.7 million persons), most substance users and most of those with
substance use disorders are employed full time.
- The prevalence of past month illicit drug use among full-time workers aged
18 to 64 was estimated to be 8.2 percent in 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Nearly one out of five (19.0 percent) workers aged 18 to 25 used
illicit drugs during the past month. This was a higher percentage than among
the 26-to-34 (10.3 percent), 35-to-49 (7.0 percent), and 50-to-64
(2.6 percent) age groups.
- Males were more likely than females to report past month illicit drug use
(9.7 vs. 6.2 percent). Males accounted for about two thirds (6.4
million) of the workers who reported past month illicit drug use.
- Workers with a college education had a lower prevalence of past month
illicit drug use compared with those without a college education. The
prevalence of past month use of illicit drugs was lower among those with
higher levels of education than those with less education (college graduate
[5.7 percent] vs. less than high school [11.2 percent]).
- The prevalence of past month illicit drug use was lower among workers with
higher family incomes than among workers with lower family incomes. An
estimated 13.2 percent of workers who reported family income that was
less than $20,000 had used illicit drugs during the past month. In contrast,
6.0 percent of workers who reported income in the highest
category––$75,000 or more––had used illicit drugs during the past
month.
- An estimated 8.8 percent, or 10.1 million, of full-time workers
reported past month heavy alcohol use. Among younger workers (18 to 25 years
old), 16.3 percent reported past month heavy alcohol use compared with
10.4 percent of 26- to 34-year-olds, 8.1 percent of 35- to
49-year-olds, and 4.7 percent of 50- to 64-year-olds.
Substance Use among Workers, by Occupation, Industry, and Establishment
Size
- Of the major occupational groups, food service workers (17.4 percent)
and construction workers (15.1 percent) exhibited a higher prevalence
of past month illicit drug use than other occupational groups. Those working
in education, training, and library occupations (4.1 percent),
community and social services occupations (4.0 percent), and protective
service occupations (3.4 percent) had the lowest prevalence of past
month illicit drug use among the major occupational groups.
- The major occupational groups with the highest prevalence of past month
heavy alcohol use were construction and extraction occupations (17.8 percent)
and installation, maintenance, and repair occupations (14.7 percent).
Community and social services occupations (2.8 percent) had the lowest
prevalence of past month heavy alcohol use of the major occupations.
- The major industry groups with the highest prevalence of past month
illicit drug use were accommodations and food services (16.9 percent)
and construction (13.7 percent). Public administration (4.1 percent),
educational services (4.0 percent), and utilities (3.8 percent)
had the lowest prevalence of past month illicit drug use.
- The industry groups with the highest prevalence of past month heavy
alcohol use were construction (15.9 percent); arts, entertainment, and
recreation (13.6 percent); and mining (13.3 percent) industries.
However, health care and social assistance (4.3 percent) and
educational services (4.0 percent) had the lowest prevalence of past
month heavy alcohol use compared with the other major industries.
- Prevalence of past month illicit drug use was lower as establishment size
increased. The prevalence among workers in establishments with 25 to 99
employees was 8.2 percent, compared with 6.7 percent among workers
in establishments with 100 to 499 employees and 5.7 percent among
workers in establishments with 500 or more employees. A similar pattern was
found for past month heavy alcohol use.
Workplace Information Policies and Programs concerning Drug and Alcohol
Use
- Among the nearly 115 million full-time workers aged 18 to 64 years in
the United States, 47.7 million (43.8 percent) reported that they had
access to educational information about drug and alcohol use in the
workplace, 87.0 million (78.7 percent) reported that they were aware of
a written policy about drug and alcohol use in the workplace, and 60.9
million (58.4 percent) reported that their employer offered an employee
assistance program (EAP).
- The youngest adult workers were least likely to report access to
educational information about drug and alcohol use in the workplace. Among
18- to 25-year-old workers, 33.2 percent reported that they had
educational information available. This was significantly lower than among
workers aged 26 to 34 years (39.6 percent), 35 to 49 years
(46.3 percent), and 50 to 64 years (48.9 percent). Young
adult workers between the ages of 18 and 25 were significantly less likely
to report EAPs available in the workplace compared with all other age groups
(39.7 vs. 56.4 to 62.6 percent).
- Nearly 3 million (32.1 percent) full-time workers between the ages of
18 and 64 who had used an illicit drug in the past month reported that they
worked for an employer who offered educational information about alcohol and
drug use. An EAP was reported available to 3.9 million (45.4 percent)
workers who were past month users of an illicit drug, while 6.5 million
(71.0 percent) reported working for employers who had a written policy
about drug and alcohol use.
- Generally, past month illicit drug users were less likely to report
working for employers who offered workplace drug or alcohol programs or
policies, compared with those who did not use an illicit drug in the past
month. An estimated 45.4 percent of past month illicit drug users
reported that there was an EAP at their place of employment compared with
59.6 percent of workers who had not used an illicit drug in the past
month.
Workplace Testing
- Among the Nation's full-time workers, 42.9 percent reported that
tests for illicit drug or alcohol use occurred at their place of employment
during the hiring process, or "prehire" testing. This equates to
more than 47 million adults who worked in settings where testing for illicit
drug or alcohol use occurred during the hiring process.
- The youngest and oldest adult workers (18 to 25 and 50 to 64 years)
were less likely to report working for employers with prehire drug testing
than workers aged 26 to 49 years. An estimated 40.8 percent of 50-
to 64-year-olds and 39.0 percent of 18- to 25-year-olds reported
prehire testing, compared with 44.3 percent of workers aged 26 to 34 years
and 44.7 percent of workers aged 35 to 49 years.
- For each age group, past month illicit drug users were less likely than
nonusers to report working for employers who conducted prehire drug or
alcohol tests (29.4 vs. 41.3 percent of 18- to 25-year-olds, 32.0 vs.
45.8 percent of 26- to 34-year-olds, 34.2 vs. 45.5 percent of 35-
to 49-year-olds, and 31.3 vs. 41.0 percent of 50- to 64-year-olds).
- A total of 29.6 percent, or 32 million, of full-time workers in the
United States reported random drug testing in their current employment
setting during the study period. The youngest workers (18 to 25 years)
were less likely than all other age groups to report working for an employer
who conducted random drug testing (27.3 vs. 29.6 percent of 26- to
34-year-olds, 30.6 percent of 35- to 49-year-olds, and 29.1 percent
of 50- to 64-year-olds).
- Past month illicit drug users were less likely to report working for
employers who conducted random drug or alcohol tests than were nondrug
users. For 18- to 25-year-olds, 19.7 percent of illicit drug users
reported that they worked in a random-testing environment compared with 29.1 percent
of nonusers. The relationship was consistent for all age groups: 20.0 versus
30.8 percent of 26- to 34-year-olds, 22.6 versus 31.2 percent of
35- to 49-year-olds, and 20.4 versus 29.3 percent of 50- to
64-year-olds.
Workplace Behaviors and Attitudes toward Drug Testing
- Among full-time workers who reported past month illicit drug use, 12.3 percent
reported working for three or more employers in the past year, compared with
5.1 percent of workers without past month drug use. They also were more
likely to report missing 2 or more workdays in the past month due to illness
or injury when compared with workers without past month use (16.4 vs. 11.0 percent).
Finally, 16.3 percent of workers who used illicit drugs in the past
month reported skipping 1 or more days of work in the past month (vs. 8.2 percent
of workers who did not use an illicit drug during the past month).
- Among full-time workers in the United States, 52.5 million (46.0 percent)
workers indicated that they would be more likely to work for an employer who
tests before hiring, and an additional 56.2 million (49.1 percent)
workers reported that prehire testing would not influence their decision to
work for an employer. Only 5.6 million (4.9 percent) workers indicated
that they would be less likely to work for an employer who conducts prehire
drug testing.
- More than half of U.S. workers reported that it would make no difference
to them if an employer tests employees randomly after hire for drug or
alcohol use. An estimated 45.5 million (39.8 percent) workers reported
that they would be more likely to work for such an employer, while 10.0
million (8.7 percent) workers reported that they would be less likely
to work for an employer who tests randomly for drug or alcohol use. An
estimated 58.8 million (51.4 percent) workers indicated that random
testing would not influence their decision to work for an employer.
- An estimated 29.1 percent of workers with past month illicit drug use
reported that they would be less likely to work for employers who conduct
drug testing randomly, while only 6.9 percent of workers who did not
report past month illicit drug use selected this response category. This
relationship was consistent in the multivariate models while controlling for
age, gender, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, family income, region,
and county type (metropolitan statistical area).