Mindfully.org  

Home | Air | Energy | Farm | Food | Genetic Engineering | Health | Industry | Nuclear | Pesticides | Plastic
Political | Sustainability | Technology | Water
pce cleanup


Farming Fish: 

The Aquaculture Boom 

World Resources Institute Fact Sheet Undated

Aquaculture -- the farming of fish, shrimp, shellfish, and seaweeds -- has been a source of human protein for nearly 4,000 years, especially in Asia [1]. Unprecedented growth in aquaculture production in the last decade, however, has given it increased importance in the modern food supply. From 1984 to 1994, world aquaculture production more than doubled, making it one of the fastest-growing food production activities [2].

    Aquaculture Production as a Share of Total Marine and Freshwater Fish Harvest, 1984-95

    Globally, almost 20 percent of all fish and shellfish production in 1995 was attributable to aquaculture, or about 21 million metric tons (not counting seaweeds) out of 112 million metric tons. 

    Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture, 1996 (FAO, Rome, 1997), Table 1, p. 5.
    Note: Includes finfish and shellfish only; does not include seaweed.

Globally, almost 20 percent of all fish and shellfish production in 1995 was attributable to aquaculture, or about 21 million metric tons (not counting seaweeds) out of 112 million metric tons [3]. Yet this industry’s contribution to the human diet is actually greater than the numbers imply. Whereas one third of the conventional fish catch is used to make fishmeal and fish oil, virtually all farmed fish are used as human food. Today, one fourth of the fish consumed by humans is the product of aquaculture, and that percentage will only increase as aquaculture expands and the world’s conventional fish catch from oceans and lakes continues to decline because of overfishing and environmental damage [4] As currently practiced, however, aquaculture also causes environmental damage, raising questions about how best to meet food demands and preserve environmental quality.

Asia dominates world aquaculture, producing four fifths of all farmed fish, shrimp, and shellfish [5]. China is by far the leading producer, contributing nearly 60 percent of 1994 world production, or some 15 million metric tons [6]. Indeed, aquaculture accounts for more than half of China’s total fish production each year. India is the second largest producer, with 9 percent of the world’s aquaculture total in 1994[7]). 



China Dominates World Aquaculture

Share of Global Aquaculture Productions, 1994

COUNTRY

PERCENT SHARE OF
GLOBAL PRODUCTION

China

57

India

9

Japan

4

Indonesia

4

Thailand

3

United States

2

Philippines

2

Korea, Republic of

2

Other Countries

17


Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture, 1996 (FAO, Rome, 1997), p. 12.


Aquaculture products fall into two distinct groups: high-valued species such as shrimp and salmon that are frequently grown for export, and lower-valued species such as carp and tilapia that are consumed primarily locally. China, for instance, raises a substantial amount of shrimp in intensively managed ponds along its coastline for the lucrative export trade [8]. Yet China’s total aquaculture production is dominated not by shrimp but by carp raised in relatively low-tech inland ponds for local consumption. The four major carp species -- silver carp, grass carp, common carp, and bighead carp -- account for more than one third of world aquaculture production -- nearly all of it in China [9].

These carp are raised primarily as a supplementary activity to regular crop agriculture on Chinese farms. Carp are herbivores and can survive on low-cost, readily available feed material, rather than on the high-cost fishmeal that carnivorous species such as shrimp and salmon require to grow; thus carp farming is both more economical and easier to integrate with other conventional farm activities than are other types of aquaculture. Whereas farmed shrimp tend to grace the tables of consumers in high-income regions like Japan, Europe, and the United States, carp make a direct, significant contribution to the protein needs of less affluent rural Chinese [10][11].

Can continued expansion of aquaculture increase the global fish catch enough to feed the world’s growing need for fish protein? Certainly, some growth in world aquaculture can be expected, but just how much is not clear. One analysis projects that, under favorable conditions, global production could nearly double by 2010 to 39 million metric tons. Several factors are pushing this growth in both intensive aquaculture and in small-scale, farm-based efforts. Global demand for fish is rising even as many ocean stocks are declining, and aquaculture techniques and technology continue to improve. In addition, small-scale aquaculture offers farmers a ready source of both subsistence food and cash, and these benefits are likely to promote expansion beyond its traditional stronghold in Asia [12].

However, there are also serious constraints on aquaculture’s future growth. For one, fish farming requires both land and water—two resources already in short supply in many areas. In Thailand both these resources have been diverted in recent years to fuel the growth of the aquaculture industry. For example, nearly half the land now used for shrimp ponds in Thailand was formerly used for rice paddies; in addition, water diversion for shrimp ponds has lowered groundwater levels noticeably in some coastal areas. In China, the concern over loss of arable land has led to restrictions on any further conversion of farmland to aquaculture ponds [13].

More serious still is concern over the environmental impacts of aquaculture operations, especially the intensive production systems and large-scale facilities used to raise high-value shrimp, salmon, and other premium species. Shrimp farming has taken an especially heavy toll on coastal habitats, with mangrove swamps in Africa and Southeast Asia being cleared at an alarming rate to make room for shrimp ponds [14][15]. In just 6 years, from 1987 to 1993, Thailand lost more than 17 percent of its mangrove forests to shrimp ponds [16]. Destruction of mangroves has left these coastal areas exposed to erosion and flooding, has altered natural drainage patterns, has increased salt intrusion, and has removed a critical habitat for many aquatic species [17].

Intensive aquaculture operations can also lead to water pollution, which is also a major concern. When flushed into nearby coastal or river waters, heavy concentrations of fish feces, uneaten food, and other organic debris can lead to oxygen depletion and contribute to harmful algal blooms. In Thailand alone, shrimp ponds discharge some 1.3 billion cubic meters of effluent into coastal waters each year [18].

Paradoxically, some aquaculture production also puts more pressure on ocean fish stocks, rather than relieving pressure. As noted previously, carnivorous species like salmon and shrimp depend on high-protein feed formulated from fishmeal—a blend of sardines, anchovies, pilchard, and other low-value fish. Some 10 to 15 percent of all fishmeal goes to aquaculture feeds, and it takes roughly 2 kilograms of fishmeal to produce a kilogram of farmed fish or shrimp. The result is a net loss of fish protein [19][20].

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations asserts that some progress has been made in reducing the environmental impacts of aquaculture. For example, several countries where salmon are farmed have instituted controls on production to ensure that pollution is kept within acceptable limits [21]. In some cases, new technology has also helped. In Puget Sound, on the west coast of the United States, one salmon farmer is using a giant, floating, semienclosed tub to raise his fish rather than the usual porous pens made of netting. The tub prevents fish wastes from polluting surrounding waters and also keeps fish from escaping and intermingling with wild salmon, which would contaminate the gene pool of the native fish [22].

Even in the problematic shrimp-farming industry, there are some initial signs of progress. In South Asia, a major shrimp producer has instituted a temporary ban on new ponds until the government adopts an acceptable social and environmental policy [23]. In addition, some shrimp farmers are advocating an "ecolabeling" scheme that would certify shrimp grown by producers using more benign farming practices [24].

Progress in aquaculture research can also be expected to help in the transition to low-impact, high-productivity fish farming in the future. For example, Chinese researchers are developing a protein supplement based on yeast that can substitute for more than half the fishmeal in aquaculture feed preparations. Further, work on fish breeding has already produced a strain of tilapia that grows 60 percent faster and with higher survival rates than native tilapia [25].

In the end, aquaculture’s contribution to the global food supply will likely turn on how well these and other innovations can help fish farms more closely mimic natural ecosystems, with better recycling of nutrients and less waste generation [26]. That will mean fewer inputs and impacts, without eroding aquaculture’s profitability and versatility.

Endnotes: Farming Fish: The Aquaculture Boom

  1. George K. Iwama, "Interactions between Aquaculture and the Environment," Critical Reviews in Environmental Control, Vol. 21, No. 2 (1991), p. 177-216.

  2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture, 1996 (FAO, Rome, 1997), p. 11.

  3. Ibid., p. 5, Table 1.

  4. Op. cit. 2, pp. 4-5.

  5. Op. cit. 2, p. 12, Figure 12.

  6. Op. cit. 2, p. 59.

  7. Op. cit. 2, pp. 11-13; p. 14, Figure 14.

  8. Biksham Gujja and Andrea Finger-Stich, "What Price Prawn? Shrimp Aquaculture's Impact in Asia," Environment, Vol. 38, No. 7 (1996), pp. 12-14, 33.

  9. Op. cit. 2, pp. 11-12.

  10. Op. cit. 2, p. 59.

  11. Bob Holmes, "Blue Revolutionaries," New Scientist (December 7, 1996), p. 34.

  12. Op. cit. 2, pp. 24-25.

  13. Op. cit. 11, pp. 35-36.

  14. Op. cit. 8, pp. 12-15, 33-39.

  15. Op. cit. 1, pp. 192-216.

  16. Op. cit. 11, p. 36.

  17. Op. cit. 1, pp. 177-216.

  18. Op. cit. 11, pp. 34-35.

  19. Op. cit. 2, p. 22.

  20. Op. cit. 11, pp. 34-35.

  21. Op. cit. 2, p. 22.

  22. Jon Christensen, "Cultivating the World's Demand for Seafood," New York Times (March 1, 1997), pp. 27-29.

  23. Op. cit. 2, p. 22.

  24. Op. cit. 22, p. 29.

  25. Op. cit. 11, pp. 34-35.

  26. Carl Folke and Nils Kautsky, "Aquaculture with Its Environment: Prospects for Sustainability," Ocean and Coastal Management, Vol. 17, No. 1 (1992), pp. 5-24.

source: http://www.wri.org/wri/trends/fishfarm.html 31jan01

World Resources Institute, 10 G Street, NE (Suite 800), Washington, DC 20002 (202/729-7600; fax: 202/729-7610). For more information contact gregm@wri.org.

If you have come to this page from an outside location click here to get back to mindfully.org