EPA Details Proposed CAFO Rules

Darcy Maulsby / AgWeb News 13mar01

As the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) prepares to write and implement new regulations for concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs), officials say they face three major challenges.

"The first is the regulatory/voluntary balance," said Karen Metchis with EPA's Office of Water/Office of Wastewater Management. "The second challenge is updating the regulations. Current CAFO regulations are more than 25 years old, and 95 percent of the poultry industry isn't covered under the current regulations. Finally, there is the challenge of excess manure. Sixty to 65 percent of manure exceeds crop needs at CAFOs and should be transferred off-site. How do we ensure manure at the CAFO is land-applied to minimize nutrient runoff, and how do we ensure that manure going off-site is properly handled?"

The EPA is currently evaluating a number of proposals to update CAFO regulations, all of which will have major impacts for many beef, dairy, swine and poultry producers.

Prposed rules have different tiers
As it revises CAFO regulations, EPA is trying to incorporate simplicity, flexibility and accountability into the rules, Metchis said. "We want to make them clear, and the public wants accountability to make sure the nation's water isn't polluted."

EPA's first co-proposal includes a three-tier structure in which all operations with more than 1,000 animal units are considered CAFOs. There would be revised conditions for whether a middle tier (300 to 1,000 animal units) operation is a CAFO. Operations in the middle tier must either certify they do not meet the conditions or must apply for a permit. Operations with less than 300 animal units would become CAFOs only if they were causing a pollution problem, Metchis said.

The second co-proposal involves a two-tiered structure in which all operations with greater than 500 animal units are defined as CAFOs. Those with less than 500 animal units are a CAFO only if designated by a permit authority, and this is evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

"The three-tiered structure offers more flexibility to the states but is more complicated. The two-tiered structure helps simplify the regulations but is less flexible than the other example," Metchis said. EPA is asking the public to submit comments on both proposals.

EPA's proposed changes for CAFO regulations would also eliminate the 25-year, 24-hour permit exemption and expand the definition of a CAFO to include both the production area and the land application area. Poultry operations, stand-alone swine nurseries and stand-alone heifer operations are also included in the proposed regulations.

Co-permitting for vertical integrators
EPA is also proposing that vertical integrators be co-permitted, especially in the pork and poultry sectors, Metchis said. In this situation, co-permitting would be required where the permit authority determines that the vertical integrators have "substantial operational control."

EPA is requesting comments on alternatives to co-permitting. The requirement could be waived, for example, if the state has an adequate and enforceable program for excess manure. A waiver could also be granted if the processor implements an "environmental management system" with contractors, where the third party would be audited for compliance, according to EPA.

For existing beef and dairy operations, the EPA's proposed performance standards for production areas include the following:

Retain the 25-year, 24-hour (plus process waste water) design specification for production areas;

If you have come to this page from an outside location click here to get back to mindfully.org